Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences

: 2015  |  Volume : 1  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 143--149

Epidemiology of cardiomyopathy - A clinical and genetic study of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: The EPOCH-H study

Amitabh Biswas1, Soumi Das1, Mitali Kapoor1, Sandeep Seth2, Balram Bhargava2, Vadlamudi Raghavendra Rao1,  
1 Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Vadlamudi Raghavendra Rao
Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi, New Delhi


Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic disorder with the prevalence of 1 in 500 globally. HCM is clinically characterized by thickening of the wall of the heart, predominantly left ventricle (LV), and interventricular septum (IVS). Our study aims to report the demographical, clinical and genetic profile of Indian HCM patients. Methods: HCM patients were recruited on the basis of WHO criteria. The clinical phenotypes were analyzed using electrocardiography, two-dimensional electrocardiography, and hotspot region of the MYH7 gene was sequenced for all patients as well as for controls. Results: There were 59 patients with a clinical diagnosis of HCM with a preponderance of disease in males with a ratio (men, women) of 5.5:1. Average age of onset of the disease was late 30 s (39.2 ± 14.5) with familial HCM accounting for 18% (n = 9) for total HCM families (n = 50). Nonobstructive kind of HCM was more prevalent as compared to obstructive HCM (66.1% vs. 33.9%). Average posterior wall LV thickness of the HCM patients was 16 ± 4.8 mm and IVS thickness was 21 ± 8.3 mm with familial patients having greater wall thickness as compared to sporadic patients. Sequencing of hotspot region of MYH7 identified three mutations in three different patients. Two mutations were found to be segregating in familial cases. Conclusion: HCM is more prevalent in males with a predominance of hypertrophic nonobstructive cardiomyopathy form. Eighteen percent of cases were familial and showed an early onset of the disease and worse prognosis as compared to sporadic cases. Hotspot sequencing of MYH7 only explains 6% of its genetic basis. More of the candidate genes need to be screened through advanced techniques like next generation sequencing to identify the causal genes which could make us understand the mechanistic pathways.

How to cite this article:
Biswas A, Das S, Kapoor M, Seth S, Bhargava B, Rao VR. Epidemiology of cardiomyopathy - A clinical and genetic study of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: The EPOCH-H study.J Pract Cardiovasc Sci 2015;1:143-149

How to cite this URL:
Biswas A, Das S, Kapoor M, Seth S, Bhargava B, Rao VR. Epidemiology of cardiomyopathy - A clinical and genetic study of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: The EPOCH-H study. J Pract Cardiovasc Sci [serial online] 2015 [cited 2021 Jun 22 ];1:143-149
Available from:

Full Text


Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common autosomal dominant form of inherited primary myocardial disorder, characterized by hypertrophy or thickening of the left (sometimes right) ventricles with histological features of myocyte hypertrophy, myofibrillar disarray, and interstitial fibrosis. The estimated prevalence rate is 1 out of 500 young adults (<35 years of age).[1],[2] The first clinical description of HCM was given in 1958 by Teare, who reported the sudden death in young patients.[3] The HCM is subdivided into two categories – obstructive and nonobstructive. The obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract due to hypertrophy is defined as hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) and no obstruction in the left ventricle (LV) outflow tract is hypertrophic nonobstructive cardiomyopathy (HNCM).[4],[5]

The disease exhibits extreme variability, in terms of age of onset, disease progression, occurrence of sudden cardiac death (SCD), spectrum and extent of symptoms, and most noticeably, the degree, and location of hypertrophy.[6],[7],[8],[9] Moreover, the disease heterogeneity can range from clinically and morphologically unaffected with an asymptomatic course and normal longevity, to severe dysfunction, including heart failure (HF), or SCD with the latter often being the first manifestation of the disease.[10],[11],[12] The first gene for familial HCM (FHCM) was mapped to chromosome 14q1.[13] In the past two decades, many causative mutations have been identified in sarcomeric and nonsarcomeric genes fostering the view that HCM is a complex disorder involving sarcomeric proteins and nonsarcomeric proteins. More than 25 genes are known to cause HCM till date, and around 1500 mutations are reported to be associated with HCM.[14]

The assessment of all the factors for the complete understanding is necessary for such complex disease. We hypothesized that unbiased representation of the spectrum of disease expression in HCM would require holistic assessment of HCM patients in the genetically heterogeneous population.


From our cohort of cardiomyopathy patients, we present HCM patients in the epidemiology of cardiomyopathy study-HCM study (EPOCH-H) in the second phase after dilated cardiomyopathy in the previous issue.[15] This cohort comprised HCM patients attending the HF clinic who fulfilled the following criteria: (1) Age ≥12 years; (2) referral with symptomatic HF with no hypertension or other cardiac causes which can cause hypertrophy of the LV or having proven HCM in the family, and/or features suggestive of HCM on prior investigations; and (3) clinical diagnosis of HCM in accordance with either task force guidelines [16] or modified diagnostic criteria for FHCM,[17] on the basis of standard noninvasive evaluation. Family members were invited to undergo genetic analysis and clinical investigation. The work follow-up included family history of HCM or any other disease, symptom assessment of patients, demographic details, clinical evaluation at the point of recruitment, 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) and two-dimensional echocardiography for all the patients and family members who participated in the study. Ethical approval was taken from authorizing committees of both institutions. Workflow of the experiment is given in [Figure 1].{Figure 1}

Five milliliter of intravenous blood sample was collected with a prior written consent of all the participants who took part in this study. Genomic DNA was extracted using phenol-chloroform method,[18] for genetic testing. Primer sequences were designed and available on request. We sequenced hotspot region (exon 23) of MYH7 gene for variant identification using Sanger method (ABI3730XL) of all the patients and independently confirmed in DNA samples by repeated sequencing of independent polymerase chain reaction products. If any variant was identified in a proband, then family members were also screened for potential risk in family members. One hundred clinically evaluated controls were also screened for the variant identified. Statistical calculations were performed using online statistical calculators at and SPSS Inc. Released 2009. PASW Statistics for Windows, version 18.0. SPSS Inc., Chicago.


Basic characterization of the cohort

Out of 66 patients, 59 patients met the inclusion criteria for HCM and were included in the study and 7 patients did not participate in the study. Out of 59 patients, with the clinical diagnosis of the HCM, 50 (84.7%) were males and 9 (15.3%) were females. The demographic details are described in [Table 1]. The cohort included 50 families in which 9 families were having ≥2 affected individuals. FHCM accounted for 18% (n = 9) of total HCM families (n = 50), whereas sporadic cases were comparatively high. Average age of onset of disease was late 30 s (39.2 ± 14.5) although out of the 59 patients, 7 patients had early age of onset (<20 years) and 5 out of 7 had familial form of HCM and other had sporadic HCM. The mean age of onset of symptoms in males was 38.7 ± 13.6 and 37.4 ± 16.7 in females. Familial cases had early onset of disease as compared to sporadic (familial [33.8 ± 15.8] vs. sporadic [40.6 ± 12.7]) although the difference was of borderline significance (P = 0.06). Males also had early onset of symptoms (33.1 ± 16.2) than females (37.6 ± 15.8) in familial cases [Table 1]. A total of 124 family members were also clinically evaluated for the HCM and recruited in this study. New York Heart Association (NYHA) class was similar in familial and sporadic cases.{Table 1}

Clinical characterization

Fifty-nine diagnosed individuals basically fell under two major categories - HOCM and HNCM. With 39 (66.1%) HNCM and 20 (33.9%) HOCM, they had a ratio of 2:1. Symptoms and signs of right-sided HF were not detected. Twelve (21.4%) patients reported to have syncopal episodes, and 4 (7.1%) had presyncope and other characteristics are detailed in [Table 2]. Most common form of the symptoms present in HCM cohort were chest pain (64.3%), shortness of breath (62.5%), and palpitation (53.5%). In the nonobstructive type of HCM, asymmetrical form of HCM was higher than other forms of HCM. Out of 59 patients, 2 (3.4%) HCM patients died suddenly, but a clinical autopsy was not conducted to confirm the cause of death. Thirteen (22.1) patients underwent alcohol ablation or trans-septal myectomy or had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator implant. Results are summarized in [Figure 2].{Table 2}{Figure 2}

Electrocardiography and echocardiographic evidences

ECG was available for all the 59 patients. ECG abnormalities were found in all HCM patients. ST-T abnormalities (93.2%) and pathological Q waves (93.2%) were there in patients. Both QRS duration ≥100 ms and bundle branch block were present in 27.1% of HCM patients. Giant T waves were seen mostly in the apical HCM patients. All familial cases attributed to ST-T abnormalities and most of the patients (83.3%) also had pathological Q waves. ST-T segment elevation (>0.02 mV) was found more in FHCM as compared to sporadic (P = 0.04). Giant T wave was present significantly higher in the sporadic form of HCM as compared to familial (P = 0.04). In sporadic cases, pathological Q waves were present in 97.5% of cases, whereas ST-T abnormalities were present in 90.2% of sporadic cases [Table 3].{Table 3}

In echocardiographic examinations, average posterior wall (PW) (LV) thickness of the HCM patients was 16 ± 4.8 mm, and interventricular septum (IVS) thickness was 21 ± 8.3 mm. Average ejection fraction (63.0 ± 8.0) was found to be normal. Mean left ventricular mass (LVM) (347.8 ± 196.9) was much higher than normal heart, details of clinical parameters are in [Table 3].

FHCM patients had higher PW (LV) thickness (18.0 ± 6.3) as compared to sporadic patients (15.0 ± 4.8) whereas IVS thickness of sporadic (21 ± 7.9) was slightly higher than familial cases (20 ± 6.2). Mean LVM of familial (365.0 ± 145.4) was greater than sporadic (321.1 ± 193.5). FHCM patients had more mitral valve regurgitation and systolic anterior motion than sporadic cases [Table 3].

Sanger sequencing of hotspot region of MYH7 gene

We sequenced all 59 HCM patients and 100 clinically evaluated controls for exon 23 of MYH7 gene through Sanger sequencing and found three variants in three different families which were absent in the control group.

In one FHCM family, a rare mutation c. 2769 C > T was identified in both affected father (51 years) and affected son (16 years) along with one unaffected brother. The father had late onset of disease (48 years) as compared to son (14 years) which was due to presence of HCM associated polymorphisms in the son inherited from the mother as reported in our previous study.[19] The affected son had undergone alcohol ablation twice and the father once. We genotyped all available family members for the mutation identified and found the other son also had the mutation but still asymptomatic.

In another FHCM family, a novel mutation was identified in codon 926 (C > T) changing amino acid leucine to valine. This mutation was found to occur in both affected brother (76 years) and sister (51 years) but on screening of family members, the mutation was identified in one of the sons (31 years) of the affected sister who had borderline clinical phenotype with no symptoms for HF. Both affected brother and sister had late onset (in 50 s) but sister's son was asymptomatic at 32 years. The disease expression may occur with age.

Another mutation at codon 924 (G > A) changing amino acid, glutamic acid to lysine was found in one of the sporadic HCM patients who were very young (22 years), no family history was reported and parents had died of an accident.

Treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

HCM patients are treated through various drugs to minimize the risk of sudden death or arrhythmias and other conditions which may increase disease pathogenicity. In our cohort, most of the patients (80%) were on beta blockers as first-line therapy for the management. Calcium channel blockers were administered to the 13.5% of patients. Other drugs such as statins, aspirins, and amiodarone were prescribed to patients as per the need of the patient [Figure 3].{Figure 3}


We studied 59 HCM patients of which there was male preponderance, nonobstructive HCM was comparatively common, and the onset was in the late 30's. Sporadic HCM was commoner, and familial type (18%) had a more severe manifestation. Hotspot sequencing picked mutations in 6% of patients.

Men are more often affected than women in HCM.[16] Our study shows preponderance of HCM in males (83.7%) with sex ratio of 5.5:1 compared to other Indian study (3.7:1),[20] Western (2.9:1),[1] and Japanese (2.3:1)[21] studies. Investigators using mouse model for FHCM, have shown lowered penetrance for the females.[22] A study using a mouse model inserted MYH7 mutations found in humans shows more pronounced electrophysiological effects in males than females.[23] It has been found that the loss of estrogen in women after menopause is strongly associated with an increase in morbidity and death from cardiovascular disease and congestive HF.[24] The role of estrogen in cardioprotection is still unclear in HCM, but mouse model studies support the notion that male sex predisposed the animal to an earlier onset and worsened cardiac phenotype than females. Females in our study were more symptomatic than males, with none in NYHA Class I; and more in NYHA Class III. A previous study by Wang et al., 2014 suggested the involvement of hormonal activity for worse prognosis in females.[25]

HOCM occurred less as compared to the nonobstructive type of HCM. In the previous study, it was reported that the obstructive type was the more common (approximately 70%) form of HCM.[26],[27] In the present study, HOCM was comparatively less than nonobstructive which may be due to different ethnic and environment stimuli. One of the studies suggest that patients with symptomatic nonobstructive HCM have some form of latent left ventricular outflow tract obstruction but are not expressed until stress is exerted on the LV function.[28] One of the reason may be the stress component of heart function is low in our HCM population comparable to the previously studied population due to which HOCM is not so common in this HCM population. For HOCM, both sexes have equal distribution, but out of two HOCM females, one (35 years) had a severe form showing poor prognosis for the female patients, which may be due to some hormonal changes. Wang et al., 2014, reported worse prognosis in female younger than 50 years but not in those with 50 years older. With nearby 96% survival, HCM patients lead near normal lives unless, they have a sudden death due to some exertion or arrhythmia.[24]

ST-T abnormalities and pathological Q waves were found in HCM patients. The presence of giant T waves was indicative of an apical form of hypertrophy. In a previous study, it was found that giant inverted T wave associated with a severe form of apical HCM.[29] FHCM patients had greater PW (LV) thickness than sporadic cases which suggest that familial form had a more severe form of the disease.

For the HCM patients, severe arrhythmia leading to sudden death are common, therefore the first line of drug for the condition is beta blockers that may prevent symptoms such as dyspnea, chest pain, and also lessen myocardial oxygen demand and decrease the outflow gradient during exercise.[12]

The genetics of inherited disorders are necessary to understand the biology of the disease. Out of 50 families studied for the MYH7, only 3 families were identified with a mutation in exon 23, which means 6% of total HCM patients. Two mutations, one (E924K) in MYH7 gene was previously reported in HCM patients [30],[31] and found to be associated with HCM; and C > T at codon 923 in MYH7 gene were found to be reported in a database with HCM phenotype from South India. A novel mutation in a family (L926V) was absent in other HCM patients as well as in clinically evaluated controls suggesting a private mutation in HCM. To identify the causal mutation, we further need extensive sequencing using next generation sequencing (NGS) approach for each family as reviewed in the previous study among various cardiomyopathies.[32] With the advent of NGS, mutations from various genes are identified which necessitate for the in silico analysis.[33] Previous genetics studies conducted in the Indian cohort have been briefly summarized in [Table 4].{Table 4}


HCM is a genetic disorder being more prevalent in males. The occurrence of HNCM was more as compared to HOCM. Around 18% of cases are familial and the rest are considered to be sporadic. FHCM patients had early onset of disease as compared to sporadic. With greater PW (LV) thickness, FHCM had a more severe form of the disease than sporadic. Genetic screening of hotspot region of MYH7 only explains 6% of the genetic basis, probably more extensive, and holistic approach to whole genome or whole exome sequencing may reveal the causal genes associated with disease pathogenesis.


The authors would like to thank the Department of Anthropology for Central Instrument Facility and all patients for their cooperation and participation in this study.

Financial support and sponsorship

This work was supported by the University Grants Commission (UGC) [39-75/2010], Govt. of India, India and Department of Biotechnology (DBT) [BT/PR 5767/MED/12/563/2012], Government of India, India to V.R.R.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.[45]


1Maron BJ, Gardin JM, Flack JM, Gidding SS, Kurosaki TT, Bild DE. Prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a general population of young adults. Echocardiographic analysis of 4111 subjects in the CARDIA Study. Coronary Artery Risk Development in (Young) Adults. Circulation 1995;92:785-9.
2Maron BJ. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: An important global disease. Am J Med 2004;116:63-5.
3Teare D. Asymmetrical hypertrophy of the heart in young adults. Br Heart J 1958;20:1-8.
4Tanjore RR, Thakkar B, Sikindlapuram AD, Narasimhan C, Kerkar PG, Vajjha HV, et al. Epidemiology and genetics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Indian J Hum Genet 2006;12:26.
5Maron BJ, Seidman JG, Seidman CE. Proposal for contemporary screening strategies in families with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:2125-32.
6Seidman JG, Seidman C. The genetic basis for cardiomyopathy: From mutation identification to mechanistic paradigms. Cell 2001;104:557-67.
7Wigle ED, Rakowski H, Kimball BP, Williams WG. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Clinical spectrum and treatment. Circulation 1995;92:1680-92.
8Maron BJ. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A systematic review. JAMA 2002;287:1308-20.
9Spirito P, Maron BJ. Significance of left ventricular outflow tract cross-sectional area in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A two-dimensional echocardiographic assessment. Circulation 1983;67:1100-8.
10Lawson JW. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Current views on etiology, pathophysiology, and management. Am J Med Sci 1987;294:191-210.
11Marian AJ. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: From genetics to treatment. Eur J Clin Invest 2010;40:360-9.
12Spirito P, Seidman CE, McKenna WJ, Maron BJ. The management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 1997;336:775-85.
13Jarcho JA, McKenna W, Pare JA, Solomon SD, Holcombe RF, Dickie S, et al. Mapping a gene for familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy to chromosome 14q1. N Engl J Med 1989;321:1372-8.
14Maron BJ, Maron MS, Semsarian C. Genetics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy after 20 years: Clinical perspectives. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:705-15.
15Das S, Biswas A, Kapoor M, Seth S, Bhargava B, Rao VR. Epidemiology of cardiomyopathy – A clinical and genetic study of dilated cardiomyopathy: The EPOCH-D study. J Pract Cardiovasc Sci 2015;1:30.
16Gersh BJ, Maron BJ, Bonow RO, Dearani JA, Fifer MA, Link MS, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;142:e153-203.
17Taylor MR, Carniel E, Mestroni L. Familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Clinical features, molecular genetics and molecular genetic testing. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2004;4:99-113.
18Thangaraj K, Joshi MB, Reddy AG, Gupta NJ, Chakravarty B, Singh L. CAG repeat expansion in the androgen receptor gene is not associated with male infertility in Indian populations. J Androl 2002;23:815-8.
19Biswas A, Das S, Seth S, Maulik SK, Bhargava B, Rao VR. Role of modifying genes on the severity of rare mutation of MYH7 gene in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. J Clin Exp Cardiolog 2012;3:2.
20Tanjore RR, Rangaraju A, Kerkar PG, Calambur N, Nallari P. MYBPC3 gene variations in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients in India. Can J Cardiol 2008;24:127-130.
21Miura K, Nakagawa H, Morikawa Y, Sasayama S, Matsumori A, Hasegawa K, et al. Epidemiology of idiopathic cardiomyopathy in Japan: Results from a nationwide survey. Heart 2002;87:126-30.
22Charron P, Carrier L, Dubourg O, Tesson F, Desnos M, Richard P, et al. Penetrance of familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Genet Couns 1997;8:107-14.
23Geisterfer-Lowrance AA, Christe M, Conner DA, Ingwall JS, Schoen FJ, Seidman CE, et al. A mouse model of familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Science 1996;272:731-4.
24Konhilas JP, Leinwand LA. The effects of biological sex and diet on the development of heart failure. Circulation 2007;116:2747-59.
25Wang Y, Wang J, Zou Y, Bao J, Sun K, Zhu L, et al. Female sex is associated with worse prognosis in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in China. PLoS One 2014;9:e102969.
26Maron MS, Olivotto I, Zenovich AG, Link MS, Pandian NG, Kuvin JT, et al. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is predominantly a disease of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Circulation 2006;114:2232-9.
27Prinz C, Farr M, Hering D, Horstkotte D, Faber L. The diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2011;108:209-15.
28Shah JS, Esteban MT, Thaman R, Sharma R, Mist B, Pantazis A, et al. Prevalence of exercise-induced left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in symptomatic patients with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Heart 2008;94:1288-94.
29Park SY, Park TH, Kim JH, Baek HK, Seo JM, Kim WJ, et al. Relationship between giant negative T-wave and severity of apical hypertrophy in patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Echocardiography 2010;27:770-6.
30Brito D, Miltenberger-Miltenyi G, Vale Pereira S, Silva D, Diogo AN, Madeira H. Sarcomeric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Genetic profile in a Portuguese population. Rev Port Cardiol 2012;31:577-87.
31Watkins H, Rosenzweig A, Hwang DS, Levi T, McKenna W, Seidman CE, et al. Characteristics and prognostic implications of myosin missense mutations in familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 1992;326:1108-14.
32Biswas A, Rao VR, Seth S, Maulik SK. Next generation sequencing in cardiomyopathy: Towards personalized genomics and medicine. Mol Biol Rep 2014;41:4881-8.
33Pillay KS. Gene mutations: Understanding the significance using in silico analysis. J Pract Cardiovasc Sci 2015;1:58.
34Waldmüller S, Sakthivel S, Saadi AV, Selignow C, Rakesh PG, Golubenko M, et al. Novel deletions in MYH7 and MYBPC3 identified in Indian families with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2003;35:623-36.
35Annapurna SD, Reena TR, Nallari P, Calambur N. Genetic variation in exon 5 of troponin-I gene in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy cases. Indian J Hum Genet 2007;13:50-3.
36Bashyam MD, Purushotham G, Chaudhary AK, Rao KM, Acharya V, Mohammad TA, et al. A low prevalence of MYH7/MYBPC3 mutations among familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients in India. Mol Cell Biochem 2012;360:373-82.
37Rai TS, Dhandapany PS, Ahluwalia TS, Bhardwaj M, Bahl A, Talwar KK, et al. ACE I/D polymorphism in Indian patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and dilated cardiomyopathy. Mol Cell Biochem 2008;311:67-72.
38Rai TS, Ahmad S, Bahl A, Ahuja M, Ahluwalia TS, Singh B, et al. Genotype phenotype correlations of cardiac beta-myosin heavy chain mutations in Indian patients with hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy. Mol Cell Biochem 2009;321:189-96.
39Dhandapany PS, Sadayappan S, Xue Y, Powell GT, Rani DS, Nallari P, et al. A common MYBPC3 (cardiac myosin binding protein C) variant associated with cardiomyopathies in South Asia. Nat Genet 2009;41:187-91.
40Rao PP, Munshi A, Mullapudi R, Kumar PS, Sharath A, Krishna GA, et al. The M235T polymorphism of the angiotensinogen gene in South Indian patients of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst 2011;12:238-42.
41Rani DS, Nallari P, Dhandapany PS, Tamilarasi S, Shah A, Archana V, et al. Cardiac Troponin T (TNNT2) mutations are less prevalent in Indian hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients. DNA Cell Biol 2012;31:616-24.
42Rani DS, Nallari P, Priyamvada S, Narasimhan C, Singh L, Thangaraj K. High prevalence of Arginine to Glutamine substitution at 98, 141 and 162 positions in Troponin I (TNNI3) associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy among Indians. BMC Med Genet 2012;13:69.
43Rangaraju A, Rani DS, Satyanarayana M, Calambur N, Swapna N, Nallari P. Genetic variations of a-cardiac actin and cardiac muscle LIM protein in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in South India. Exp Clin Cardiol 2012;17:26-9.
44Govindaraj P, Khan NA, Rani B, Rani DS, Selvaraj P, Jyothi V, et al. Mitochondrial DNA variations associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Mitochondrion 2014;16:65-72.
45Selvi Rani D, Nallari P, Dhandapany PS, Rani J, Meraj K, Ganesan M, et al. Coexistence of Digenic Mutations in Both Thin (TPM1) and Thick (MYH7) Filaments of Sarcomeric Genes Leads to Severe Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in a South Indian FHCM. DNA Cell Biol 2015;34:350-9.